Subcribe to Financial Advisor magazine
More information on our advertisers

OTHER PUBLICATIONS

FA green

Private Wealth.com

Journal of Indexes.com

Nick Murray interactive

Exchange Traded Funds report

 
 AIG
Date 3/19/2010
Time 4:03pm ET
Trade 34.80
Change 0.16
% Chg 0.46%
Open 34.92
High 35.02
Low 33.85
Volume 11,326,783
Intraday 
Powered by JoomlaGadgets
FA News
November 24, 2009
Wealthy Clients Face New Taxes From Health-Care Overhaul
(Dow Jones) Wealthy taxpayers can count on helping to pay for the health-care overhaul, no matter which version of the legislation Congress adopts in the end.

A new list shows how high the tab could be if the Senate bill carries the day.

The Joint Committee on Taxation published a list of 17 tax-related items in the Senate bill, which it estimates will raise around $370 billion in revenues over the next 10 years. Fourteen of the items are measures that would raise taxes.

Among the most aggressive of the proposed tax hikes: a 40% excise tax on health coverage over $8,500 for individuals ($23,000 for families); an additional 0.5% tax on hospital insurance for single taxpayers who make over $200,000 ($250,000 for joint filers), and a raised floor of 10% adjusted gross income for itemizing medical deductions (currently, one can itemize medical deductions to the extent they exceed 7.5% of AGI). The bill also proposes a 5% excise tax on cosmetic surgery.

While the Senate bill keeps all of its tax measures health related, the House bill includes some that are not.

Mark Luscombe, principal analyst for tax and accounting at CCH, a Wolters Kluwer business, says the tax hit on the wealthy would probably be heavier from the House bill because it raises the bulk of its revenue from a proposed surtax on the wealthy.

New taxes from health-care overhaul, along with higher individual marginal tax rates and expected capital gains increases after 2010 would push the effective tax rate on the wealthy to record highs, according to opponents of the overhaul bills.

And, the overhaul will fundamentally alter the scope and mission of the IRS, says CCH in a report it published last week. The IRS, it explains, would be responsible for overseeing the administration of additional taxes on individuals and employers, determining various exemptions, overseeing new information reporting requirements.

As reported by CCH, Senate Finance Committee ranking member Charles Grassley (R.,Iowa) recently asked the Treasury Department for details on how the IRS would implement some of the measures. IRS Commissioner Doug Shulman declined to provide details but said the IRS would be ready.
Wealthy taxpayers can count on helping to pay for health-care overhaul, no matter which version of the legislation Congress adopts in the end.

A new list shows how high the tab could be if the Senate bill carries the day.

The Joint Committee on Taxation published a list of 17 tax-related items in the Senate bill, which it estimates will raise around $370 billion in revenues over the next 10 years. Fourteen of the items are measures that would raise taxes.

Among the most aggressive of the proposed tax hikes: a 40% excise tax on health coverage over $8,500 for individuals ($23,000 for families); an additional 0.5% tax on hospital insurance for single taxpayers who make over $200,000 ($250,000 for joint filers), and a raised floor of 10% adjusted gross income for itemizing medical deductions (currently, one can itemize medical deductions to the extent they exceed 7.5% of AGI). The bill also proposes a 5% excise tax on cosmetic surgery.

While the Senate bill keeps all of its tax measures health related, the House bill includes some that are not.

Mark Luscombe, principal analyst for tax and accounting at CCH, a Wolters Kluwer business, says the tax hit on the wealthy would probably be heavier from the House bill because it raises the bulk of its revenue from a proposed surtax on the wealthy.

New taxes from health-care overhaul, along with higher individual marginal tax rates and expected capital gains increases after 2010 would push the effective tax rate on the wealthy to record highs, according to opponents of the overhaul bills.

And, the overhaul will fundamentally alter the scope and mission of the IRS, says CCH in a report it published last week. The IRS, it explains, would be responsible for overseeing the administration of additional taxes on individuals and employers, determining various exemptions, overseeing new information reporting requirements.

As reported by CCH, Senate Finance Committee ranking member Charles Grassley (R.,Iowa) recently asked the Treasury Department for details on how the IRS would implement some of the measures. IRS Commissioner Doug Shulman declined to provide details but said the IRS would be ready.

 

Copyright (c) 2009, Dow Jones. For more information about Dow Jones' services for advisors, please click here.

 
Comments
Please login to write comments.

3.26 Copyright (C) 2008 Compojoom.com / Copyright (C) 2007 Alain Georgette / Copyright (C) 2006 Frantisek Hliva. All rights reserved."

FA green magazine March 2010
Click Here

Private Wealth cover 0310
Click Here

Quick Poll

Do you expect a market correction by June 30?
 
Managing Retirement Income: Part III
An investment in stocks of companies that provide both high- and growing-dividend income can benefit a retirement portfolio undergoing the duress of withdrawals.
Read more...
 
Overlooked Lending
Small business owners remain caught in a credit squeeze. Here's how advisors may be able to be able to help such clients.
Read more...
 
Getting Technical
Few financial advisors go into business because they love spending time thinking about their back-office and technology, but often find themselves dealing with too many back-office distractions. Yet streamlining your practice doesn't have to be difficult.
Read more...
 
A New Plan
A client with a need for income had her retirement assets slashed more than 40% to $500,000 as a result of the 2008 market crash. Here's how one advisor helped.
Read more...
 
Managing Retirement Income: Part II
Some retirees don't realize that their spending plans are too simple—and flawed. An "endowment" spending policy may be a better choice.
Read more...
 

Discussion

Should all advisors fall under one self-regulatory organization and could that happen on Mary Schapiro’s watch?

Join the Discussion

 





 


Financial Advisor magazine on twitter

LinkedIn-logo