Subcribe to Financial Advisor magazine
FA News
July 10, 2009
Unsuitable Annuities Tied To Reverse Mortgages
As more financial advisors sell insurance, a recent report indicates some could be unsuitably cross-selling annuities in conjunction with reverse mortgages.

The U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) report, requested by Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-MO) and released in June, cites recent cases in which reverse mortgages were sold to seniors to get them to inappropriately invest in annuities.

A reverse mortgage, generally limited to persons at least 62 years-old, is similar to a home equity loan or credit line. But the borrower needs no income to qualify. Typically, the loan needn’t be repaid until the borrower moves, sells the home or dies.

Nearly all reverse mortgages are “Home Equity Conversion Mortgages (HECMs),” administered by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD).

Under the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008, a lender or anyone else can’t require a HECM borrower to purchase insurance, an annuity or similar product as a condition of obtaining the HECM.

Plus, a lender can’t be associated with any other financial or insurance product. If he or she is, firewalls and other safeguards must be maintained to ensure that employees originating HECMs don’t also sell other financial products.  
HUD is developing regulations to implement these provisions.

In the meantime, eight of 29 insurance regulators responding to GAO reported that from 2005 through January 2009, they had at least one case of an insurance agent selling an unsuitable insurance product that a consumer had purchased using reverse mortgage funds. Of those, four said their states took action.

The report cited these cross-selling cases that had actual or potential violations of state insurance laws:

In Hawaii, an independent mortgage broker, who owned his own insurance company, was prosecuted for deceiving 15 clients. He included paperwork for an annuity in HECM closing documents without their knowledge and collected fees from both sales.

In Maine, an insurance company sales manager arranged for a large reverse mortgage lender rep to speak with his sales agents about reverse mortgages. They later referred 14 clients to the reverse mortgage lender. All obtained reverse mortgages. One 81 year-old widow was sold a deferred annuity that earned only 3.25%, purchased with her reverse mortgage, which charged 4.12%.

In California, two insurance agents allegedly designed a seminar to teach licensed insurance and real estate agents. They are charged with teaching agents to convince senior homeowners that purchasing an annuity with reverse mortgage funds is a condition for obtaining that loan.

These examples may just be the tip of the iceberg on unsuitable reverse mortgage cross-selling. FINRA, according to the report, doesn't track the origin of funds for unsuitable annuity sales. And 14 of 29 insurance regulators responding said they lacked searchable complaint databases.

The GAO report also calls for improved controls over HUD reverse mortgage counseling, and it detailed deceptive reverse mortgage marketing claims.

 

 
Comments
mesofun  - Who will stop the idiots!!   |2010-01-31 12:26:23
Okay, so what I've read is that a HUD ruling states that "A LENDER CAN'T BE ASSOCIATED WITH ANY OTHER FINANCIAL OR INSURANCE PRODUCT". So then, that means that Bank of America, Chase, Wells Fargo & others are all completely and totally breaking the law!!!!!!!!! I mean, doesn't Wells Fargo have Wells Fargo Advisors????? WHO ARE THESE FREAKIN IDIOTS WHO THINK CROSS-SELLING SHOULD BE ILLEGAL??!! Certainly there are some unsuitable situations out there but take a look at this... If a person had taken $20,000 out of there home 3 years ago before the catastrophic home prices collapse and placed that money into a fixed annuity, they would have some money today through being well diversified (home & investments). BUT NO!!! The government says you must keep all your money in your home and you must not ever purchase any life insurance or an annuity. My God how I wish an attorney would rip these idiots apart. The big insurance companies need to kill these morons rather than hide from them in trying to be compliant. It is not a good thing to be compliant with idiocracy.
rsf8  - Unsuitable Always?   |2009-07-11 11:40:29
The safest Reverse Mortgage product is the fixed interest rate version. The only payout option is a lump sum. The client needs lifetime income. Maybe they should put the money into a "safe" CD or MM account. But wait, that does not accomplish the clients goals. Last I checked, an immediate annuity was the only answer. But I guess the government knows best and the annuity would be unsuitable! OBTW, your home and it's mortgage are usually the largest financial related issues people deal with. I guess it would be prudent to keep those parties separate (Reverse Mortgage originators and Financial Planners). I mean come on now, you wouldn't want your doctor talking to the pharmacist or your accountant communicating with your attorney, right?

Remember the saying, "never say always"!
Please login to write comments.

3.26 Copyright (C) 2008 Compojoom.com / Copyright (C) 2007 Alain Georgette / Copyright (C) 2006 Frantisek Hliva. All rights reserved."

FA green magazine March 2010
Click Here

Private Wealth cover 0310
Click Here

Quick Poll

Do you expect a market correction by June 30?
 
Overlooked Lending
Small business owners remain caught in a credit squeeze. Here's how advisors may be able to be able to help such clients.
Read more...
 
Getting Technical
Few financial advisors go into business because they love spending time thinking about their back-office and technology, but often find themselves dealing with too many back-office distractions. Yet streamlining your practice doesn't have to be difficult.
Read more...
 
A New Plan
A client with a need for income had her retirement assets slashed more than 40% to $500,000 as a result of the 2008 market crash. Here's how one advisor helped.
Read more...
 
Managing Retirement Income: Part II
Some retirees don't realize that their spending plans are too simple—and flawed. An "endowment" spending policy may be a better choice.
Read more...
 
When the IRS Comes Auditing
Our writer tells how he learned to greatly appreciate his financial advisor when he faced the classic taxpayer's nightmare: an audit.
Read more...
 

Discussion

Should all advisors fall under one self-regulatory organization and could that happen on Mary Schapiro’s watch?

Join the Discussion

 





 


Financial Advisor magazine on twitter

LinkedIn-logo