Subcribe to Financial Advisor magazine
More information on our advertisers

OTHER PUBLICATIONS

FA green

Private Wealth.com

Journal of Indexes.com

Nick Murray interactive

Exchange Traded Funds report

 
 AIG
Date 3/19/2010
Time 4:03pm ET
Trade 34.80
Change 0.16
% Chg 0.46%
Open 34.92
High 35.02
Low 33.85
Volume 11,326,783
Intraday 
Powered by JoomlaGadgets
FA News
March 03, 2009
Advisors Advise Congress About Retirement
Two members of the Financial Planning Association testified to Congress on the impact of the failing markets on the country’s retirement outlook. In separate congressional hearings last week, FPA Board member Deena Katz spoke before the Senate Special Committee on Aging about the financial issues facing baby boomers, while Andrew Keeler, former FPA government relations committee chairman, asked Congress to bolster a tax credit to help small businesses offset costs in setting up defined contribution plans.

Katz, an associate professor in the personal financial planning department at Texas Tech University and chairman of Evensky & Katz, a Coral Gables, Fla.-based fee-only planning firm, laid out ways to help improve the odds that people won’t outlive their assets. Among them: people will need to work longer and laws should be changed to make it easier to do that, planners need to design total-return portfolios, advice needs to be based on fiduciary principles and retirees should be encouraged to get financial education.

“The economic typhoon of the last year has seriously damaged boomer portfolios and even the gurus in Washington and on Wall Street have no clue how long recovery may take,” Katz said. “Although the risks of outliving one’s assets are present in any economic climate, the current crisis has unquestionably heightened those fears and caused professional advisors and their academic colleagues like myself to review how our investment strategies correlate with system risk in the marketplace.”

Katz cited mortality tables suggesting that a couple 65 years old would have a 95% chance of one of them living to age 91. “Boomers have an unrealistic view of their own mortality,” she said. “What keeps me up nights, and ought to keep you awake, is that you will outlive your assets.”

Two years of pummeled portfolios and reduced home values have devastated many portfolios, Katz said, at a time when the shift away from defined benefit plans to defined contribution plans has eroded the retirement cash stream. As a result, many boomers will work during their so-called retirement years, she added.

“The 2007 Annual Gallup personal finance poll discovered that 78% of the people surveyed will continue to work,” Katz said.  “We have been seeing this trend in our practice recently. Of course, for many boomers, there may be fewer work opportunities and less flexibility in their choices. Unfortunately, with the myriad of financial risks facing us, neither working longer nor simplistic, safe-product solutions are likely to be a total solution to funding our retirement.

“The solution is to design a total return portfolio, one that focuses on the return and not fixed-interest payments. As planners, we can then help our clients implement a more flexible strategy by diversifying assets to generate higher investment returns over the long-term, and protect ourselves against inflation and the real risk of outliving our assets.”

Among Katz’ suggestions to Congress to boost boomers’ chances for a satisfying retirement is to insure that all financial advice offered to investors “be based on fiduciary principles; i.e., the simple and equitable concept that recommendations will be made based on the best interest of the client, that conflicts of interest will be minimized and that any remaining conflicts be clearly disclosed.”

“As in the case with ERISA,” she said, “hold all professionals who provide advice to retirees to that fiduciary standard.”

Katz also said Congress should encourage financial education for retirees that focuses on financial planning as a process, not one that promotes product-centric solutions.

Regarding the need and/or desire for some aging boomers to work beyond normal retirement age, Katz asked Congress not to hinder boomers’ ability to actively participate in the economy. “Revisit legislation that makes it difficult or impossible for us to continue working into our 70s or possibly 80s,” she said.

For his part, Keeler, a partner with Everhart Financial Group Inc. in Dublin, Ohio, spoke of the challenges small businesses face in funding and maintaining retirement plans during the economic downturn. To encourage small businesses to maintain their plans, Keeler suggested enhancing the current tax credit used to offset the startup cost and the cost of educating employees about the new plan.

Created under The Economic Growth and Tax Relief and Reconciliation Act, the credit is available to offset costs paid or incurred in tax years beginning after December 31, 2001, for retirement plans that first become effective after that date, Keeler said. The credit currently equals 50% of the cost to set up and administer the plan and educate employees about the plan, up to a maximum of $500 per year for each of the first three years of the plan. This credit is limited to those employers with 100 or fewer employees who received at least $5,000 in compensation for the preceding year; at least one participant must be a non-highly compensated employee.

“This credit should be broadened to include any employer with less than 500 employees, and it should also be broadened to offset employer contributions to a retirement plan,” Keeler said.

 

To see Katz's or Keeler's full testimony, click here.

 
Comments
nationalltc  - Is she kidding?   |2009-03-10 15:10:29
First I have to say I have to agree with Mr. Sterling's post.

Since the entire presentation was not reported I can only comment on what is here. I thank Ms. Katz for her efforts to help Congress in dealing with the future of 60+ million boomers.

I do wonder about some of what had been said, for example, Katz's suggestion that “all financial advice offered to investors be based on fiduciary principles.” Isn't that what they're supposed to be doing in the first place?

Why are fee-based advisers any better? Are they not also the ones who navigated so many clients into the iceberg? But all of the sudden NOW they have the answers and NOW they are acting based on their fiduciary duty?

And the education point: “encourage financial education for retirees” - there are hundreds of good books, classes at local colleges, and websites with enough information for those who want to learn, but they still often will take the “advice” of their investment advisor. The best investment is the one you don't have to think about, and that's why advisors are paid, so you don't have to lose sleep regardless of how educated/uneducated you are.

According to guidetolongtermcare.com as many as 70% of boomers will need long term care for an average of 3 years at a cost of over $70,000 per year. Some may end up easily spending over $500,000. It seems all that Katz is worried about is boomers portfolio performance with no mention of protecting the portfolio from rising medical costs and long term care costs. Congress needs to act now on overseeing the protection of boomers retirement, or what's left of it, and ignore lobbyists (good luck).

Katz was right to ask Congress not to hinder boomers’ ability to actively participate in the economy. The U.S. Govt. won't let pilots fly after 60... all that praise for US Airways pilot “Sulley” who will be forced to retire in less than 2 years. Oh well, Congress has never really impressed me, quite the opposite. We need a retooling of Congress based on what I've read by David Cay Johnston the sooner the better.

Sincerely,
Michael McDonnell
http://www.nationalltcinsurance.com
DFSterling  - Congress and Hidden Agenda?   |2009-03-03 08:11:50
I was intrigued but not surprised by the account of Ms. Katz's testimony before Congress. References to total-return portfolios, coupled with an apparent rejection of fixed-payments and safe products, fits the profile of a fee-based asset manager.

I also found it interesting that Ms. Katz was compelled to comment negatively about product-centric solutions; implying that only fee-based advisors can "act" in the best interests of the client or in a fiduciary capacity.

Serving the best interests of the client requires a more open-minded and flexible view of the financial planning process and the array of service platforms and products that can provide solutions during these very challenging times.

I can only hope that Ms. Katz provided a more comprehensive view before Congress than what was represented here. For example, the integration of insurance products into the planning, advisory and asset management process has much to offer - benefits that can can not be duplicated by "total-return" managed portfolios. I will leave it to the gurus of fee-based models to imagine the multitude of applications.

David F. Sterling, Esq.
Please login to write comments.

3.26 Copyright (C) 2008 Compojoom.com / Copyright (C) 2007 Alain Georgette / Copyright (C) 2006 Frantisek Hliva. All rights reserved."

FA green magazine March 2010
Click Here

Private Wealth cover 0310
Click Here

Quick Poll

Do you expect a market correction by June 30?
 
Managing Retirement Income: Part III
An investment in stocks of companies that provide both high- and growing-dividend income can benefit a retirement portfolio undergoing the duress of withdrawals.
Read more...
 
Overlooked Lending
Small business owners remain caught in a credit squeeze. Here's how advisors may be able to be able to help such clients.
Read more...
 
Getting Technical
Few financial advisors go into business because they love spending time thinking about their back-office and technology, but often find themselves dealing with too many back-office distractions. Yet streamlining your practice doesn't have to be difficult.
Read more...
 
A New Plan
A client with a need for income had her retirement assets slashed more than 40% to $500,000 as a result of the 2008 market crash. Here's how one advisor helped.
Read more...
 
Managing Retirement Income: Part II
Some retirees don't realize that their spending plans are too simple—and flawed. An "endowment" spending policy may be a better choice.
Read more...
 

Discussion

Should all advisors fall under one self-regulatory organization and could that happen on Mary Schapiro’s watch?

Join the Discussion

 





 


Financial Advisor magazine on twitter

LinkedIn-logo