Financial Advisor Magazine
May 2009 issue
Worth The Investment
The simple truth is that those advisors boasting an efficient document management system can bring their costs way down over time.
By David Lawrence   
Financial advisors are facing increased regulation and, in some instances, overlapping regulations that will constrain business and also increase their workload, add to their storage needs and require them to do additional staff training. Never has there been a greater need for electronic document management (sometimes called electronic content management, or ECM).

Most firms look at document management as filing, whether they use paper or electronic files, and it’s often likely that they’ve set up informal procedures for handling them. A properly designed ECM system integrates work-flow procedures and controls, which usually means it is tied into a database (client relationship management software, for instance). Other firms set up a stand-alone indexing system—a folder tree like the one you find on a computer’s operating system. But without specific, strict controls, informal systems pose problems. One is that documents can be misfiled, or worse, that employees unfamiliar with the folder trees can simply create new folders for items that should have been placed elsewhere. This makes document retrieval difficult and frustrating, to say the least.

A common mistake made by some firms is to use a system that saves documents in a PDF instead of a more secure format such as a TIFF. This means documents can be altered after the fact, and the firm risks potentially violating federal regulations. While some scanner manufacturers have addressed this issue with post-imprint symbols and other coding mechanisms to ensure authenticity, there are still lingering doubts about the security of the original documents.

It may be tough to justify additional expenses nowadays, but the simple truth is that those advisors boasting an efficient document management system can bring their costs down over time—way down. These lower costs can soften the blow of any up-front expenses and fully justify the time commitment necessary to implement the systems.

If you’re associated with a broker-dealer, chances are it is already offering some level of document management (form capture, forms you can fill out, outsourced electronic storage, etc.). If not, there are a host of available systems that can transform your financial practice into a highly efficient operation by helping you go paperless.

The SEC and FINRA have both ruled on the acceptability of paperless storage, retrieval and recovery. They have even ruled on the acceptability of electronic signatures (with specific guidelines). Among other things, a planner’s document management process must comply with SEC and FINRA rules, Sarbanes-Oxley and the USA Patriot Act. There should also be a way for him to provide an audit trail.

So what is stopping you? It’s likely two things: the cost and the knowledge you need to get the job done right. A typical system such as Laserfiche Avante (www.laserfiche.com), for example, can cost about $4,000 for the initial outlay to serve an office of four staffers (and the Avante system was designed to be affordable).

While it sounds like a lot of money, though, consider what such a system could do in shaving off staff time and increasing productivity and profitability. With such a system, there would be a much faster document storage and retrieval process. The office can also go paperless, allowing a planner to save a great deal of office space and reduce staff time enough to equal the salary of another employee. So you may wish to ask yourself, would I be willing to spend $4,000 to save up to $40,000? Also consider that the annual renewal costs are much less, even though the savings continue.

At the Laserfiche Institute Conference, held in Los Angeles from January 12-14, 2009, and attended by more than 1,000 people, the company’s founder and president, Nien-Ling Wacker, said she hoped to make the company the sweetheart of IT by introducing a new line of products that easily communicate with Microsoft products such as SharePoint and by “expanding sales and systems from document management to business process management,” as she put it in her keynote address.

Most financial advisors are only aware of Laserfiche as a provider of document management solutions for the financial advisory profession. But clients such as the Mexican Immigration Service, the country of Uganda and the U.S. Congress also use the technology.

Xerox has also made inroads with its robust ECM product DocuShare Express (www.docushare.com), which the company offers to small and medium-size businesses for scanning, document storage and retrieval. Users can share documents and collaborate online through a Web browser, and the product can also of course be tightly integrated with Xerox’s own scanning equipment.

The product allows users to build a more robust enterprise-level system later, if their firms grow.

Both of these systems comply with Sarbanes-Oxley, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and SEC Rule 17a-4, since they create and store documents as TIFF images, generally regarded as an unalterable format for electronic storage.

Broker-dealers often provide their own documents, many times fillable PDF versions that advisors must transmit through secure, proprietary systems the B-D owns itself. If the B-D does not supply the advisor with forms, she may need to locate a reliable source, and there are at least two: LaserApps (www.laserapps.com) and QuikForms (www.quikforms.com). Firms like these typically offer thousands of forms for download, though advisors use only a few. It would be wise to ensure that the forms you need are actually located in these databases before signing up for them. These services might also add a form for you, if they don’t already have it in their inventory.

You may also create your own forms if they aren’t available elsewhere. For this, you need Adobe Acrobat (www.adobe.com), either in its standard or professional versions. There is a much-overlooked feature in this program that permits you to take a PDF document and create empty form fields. You may only need to do this to a few forms, so it could save hours of staff labor.

However you choose to create documents, if you use a comprehensive document management system with automated work-flow features, you can significantly increase the efficiency and profitability of your practice.
 
Comments
ifogel  - PDF vs TIFF   |2009-10-29 08:28:12
Both Bill and Joel are correct neither PDF or TIFF are totally secure as both can be modified.

I am CEO of DocuXplorer Software, a product used by many Financial Advisors that is familiar to both Joel and Bill.

The only sure way to secure documents is with a document management program that can provide their clients with a security system that requires a user login, password and audit trail on each document. The security system should allow for granularity so that users can be denied permission to modify documents or the index data associated, as well as the ability to export, print or email documents.

A good document management program will assure that these basic functions are provided and are easy to implement.

Ira Fogel
DocuXplorer Software
www.docuxplorer.com
joel.bruckenstein@usa.net  - PDF vs. TIFF   |2009-05-29 08:18:43
I have a great deal of respect for my colleague and friend David Lawrence, however, sometimes friends can respectfully disagree with each other.

I am not of the opinion that TIFF is more secure than PDF. Furthermore, it has recently come to my attention that there is a great deal of misinformation circulating in the advisor community with regard to the relative merits of TIFF vs PDF.

My column in the July issue will hopefully set the record straight and answer any questions readers may have with regard to PDF and TIFF file formats.

Joel Bruckenstein
dLawrence  - Monthly Columnist - FA Mag   |2009-05-23 05:31:30
I wish to comment on this issue of TIFF vs. PDF.
I went back to my notes on this article to recall why I referred to it as a generally accepted industry standard. I located my conversations with both Laserfiche and Xerox on this point. I also found a white paper on it, from the construction industry, that supports the standard and explains why. (available upon request) I found others from architectural, design and government sources as well.

Another issue is the cost factors. I found a reference to the copyright issue, that some firms have opted for TIFF for more than just security and compression efficiency, but perhaps due to the higher costs of paying for the use of ‘PDF’.

In most of my columns, I try to nail down at least three sources for a statement like this (can’t get past my journalism background, I guess). I remembered that there was some debate over the acceptability of the PDF format. So, when researching this article, I looked for outside sources (non-financial) that might corroborate the point. In article after article, I kept seeing the TIFF Group IV referred to as an industry standard.

“Most document management image files follow two standards: TIFF Group IV (Industry Standard) and
PDF (the de facto standard).”
Quote from Courtside Document Services

“Tiff Group IV is the image compression format most widely used in document imaging today.” – Quote from LegalScans


One benefit that I failed to mention in the article was the compression capabilities of a TIFF image versus the PDF. TIFF appears to be better at this, thus conserving space. The irony is that Aldus Corp, developer of the TIFF format was purchased by Adobe Software, developer of the PDF format some years ago.

Hope this information proves helpful to my readers. I have spoken with my friend Joel Bruckenstein on this issue and he may write a follow-up article on the differences and the controversy.

Thanks,

Dave
wintbill@yahoo.com  - PDF and TIFF security is no different   |2009-05-15 19:45:53
I'm not sure what Mr. Lawrence means when he says the PDF format is not as secure as TIFF.

Both formats are equally susceptible to manipulation and alteration after initial scanning/conversion and can be made to look like originals.

The best practice is to save all electronic media in a system that provides audit trails for all documents. PDFs and TIFFs can be changed after the fact, but it is much more difficult to modify an audit trail in a document management program.

Bill Winterberg, CFP®
http://FPPad.com
Please login to write comments.
Login | Logout
Powered by !JoomlaComment 3.26

3.26 Copyright (C) 2008 Compojoom.com / Copyright (C) 2007 Alain Georgette / Copyright (C) 2006 Frantisek Hliva. All rights reserved."